A response to How to hard-fork to save most users’ funds in a quantum emergency by Vitalk Buterin
Written by Lisa Kim
Two weeks ago, the Abelian Foundation delved into the transformative role of quantum computing across various sectors, highlighting both advancements and challenges ahead in 2024. Haven’t read it yet? Click here to read. Yet, a key issue was left untouched in the previous article: the threat such advancements pose to blockchain security, particularly the vulnerabilities in cryptographic protocols like Bitcoin and Ethereum’s secp256k1 elliptic curve.
Despite the blockchain community’s widespread acknowledgment of quantum computing’s potential risks, meaningful discussions on this topic are few and far between. This lack is often attributed to a combination of limited in-depth understanding and apprehension about the far-reaching consequences of a quantum attack on Ethereum wallets. This blog post responds to Vitalik Buterin’s proposed strategies against quantum threats, outlined in Ethereum Research.
The Quantum Challenge to Blockchain
Quantum computing poses a significant risk to traditional blockchain infrastructures like Ethereum, which rely on cryptographic methods vulnerable to quantum decryption, such as the secp256k1 elliptic curve. Recognized as the Achilles’ heel of the cryptocurrency industry, this vulnerability could be exploited by quantum computers to compromise private keys and threaten user assets’ security. In response, Vitalik Buterin has suggested updates and hard forks aimed at introducing quantum-resistant transaction types and security measures to protect the digital economy housed within these assets.
Vitalik Buterin’s Take on Quantum Computing
The Ethereum blockchain can be updated (hard fork) to protect users’ funds in the event of a quantum attack, requiring users to download new wallet software.
Buterin’s recent propositions for a hard fork to combat quantum threats underline the urgency of enhancing Ethereum’s defenses. By suggesting updates that would require users to migrate to new wallet software, Buterin aims to bolster security measures. However, this approach has faced criticism for its perceived reactive stance, lacking in comprehensive preventive measures and potentially leaving Ethereum exposed until quantum capabilities pose a direct threat.
Additionally, there are significant technical challenges associated with implementing a hard fork in response to a post-quantum computing attack. This approach hinges on a critical assumption, highlighted as the first point in Buterin’s proposal: the need for absolute clarity regarding the specific block to which a wallet should be reverted or rewound for the proposal to function effectively. However, in practice, achieving such certainty is impractical. Often, victims may not realize their wallet has been compromised until it’s too late. By then, the stolen tokens are likely to have been spent or cashed out, rendering the process of rewinding transactions futile.
The Abelian Foundation’s Proactive Approach
Contrasting with Buterin’s reactive proposals, the Abelian Foundation advocates for a proactive, comprehensive framework to address quantum vulnerabilities.
The foundation’s long-term research and work in lattice-based cryptography and the development of the Post-Quantum Zero-Knowledge Bridge (PQZK Bridge) showcases a commitment to pre-empting quantum attacks with quantum-resistant mechanisms. The PQZK Bridge echoes Buterin’s approach of transitioning user wallets to a different blockchain, yet it focuses on ensuring this process is both private and secure. This forward-thinking strategy aims to secure the blockchain ecosystem before quantum threats materialize, surpassing the limitations of Buterin’s suggestions.
The Foundation’s technological innovations in the PQZK bridge include:
- Binding wallets across a conventional and a quantum-resistant blockchain using a post-quantum Non-Interactive Zero-Knowledge (NIZK) proof system.
- Upgrading transactions to be quantum-proof through a transactional proof (TxProof_A) verified by the post-quantum NIZK system.
- Requiring miners/validators to verify both the wallet binding and transactional proofs, ensuring quantum resistance.
- Implementing a PQZKBridge Wallet for interactions across both blockchain systems.
- Developing a Layer 2 solution to demonstrate the PQZK Bridge technology and enable post-quantum smart contract functionalities.
Explore the full yellow paper here.
Empirical Support and Global Initiatives
The imperative for quantum-resistant cryptography is increasingly validated by empirical research and global cybersecurity initiatives. Studies, such as those published in Scientific Reports, expose the susceptibility of extant blockchain technologies to the advanced decryption capabilities of quantum computing, underscoring the necessity for an industry-wide shift towards more robust cryptographic defenses. This research substantiates the call for early adoption of quantum-resistant measures to preemptively shield digital assets.
In a parallel development, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has been proactive in identifying lattice-based cryptography as an essential ingredient in the composition of quantum-resistant standards. NIST’s 2022 announcement introducing a suite of encryption tools capable of withstanding the threat posed by quantum computation corroborates the efficacy of lattice-based approaches. Such endorsements and actions by NIST do not merely echo the principles that the Abelian Foundation espouses but also reflect a broader, collective stride towards enhancing digital security in anticipation of the quantum age.
Securing the Future: The Abelian Foundation’s Vision for a Quantum-Resistant Blockchain
The discourse around post-quantum blockchain security reveals a contrast between Ethereum’s Vitalik Buterin’s reactive proposals and the Abelian Foundation’s proactive stance. Buterin’s statement, suggesting hard forks and security updates, reflects a responsive rather than preventive approach to the quantum threat. In contrast, the Abelian Foundation’s pioneering work in lattice-based cryptography showcases a forward-thinking strategy aimed at preempting quantum vulnerabilities. If you’re skeptical on the reality of quantum computing, or would like to know how quantum computing works, read our previous post “How Imminent is Quantum Computing Anyways?”
The Abelian Foundation is not just responding to the quantum challenge; they are setting a new standard for blockchain security, ensuring that the future of digital transactions remains safe, secure, and, most importantly, quantum-resistant. As we stand on the brink of a new computing age, the foundation’s work can serve as a vital cornerstone in the construction of a quantum-safe blockchain infrastructure, guaranteeing that our digital world remains resilient in the face of quantum advancements.
About Abelian
Abelian is a quantum-resistant blockchain infrastructure which enables digital gold 2.0 and empowers the post-quantum crypto ecosystem. Learn more about the quantum-safe Abelian blockchain & $ABEL Tokenomics at our documentation page.
The Abelian Foundation welcomes all feedback regarding tech developments and upcoming changes. To join the conversation, please visit us on our various social media and community channels linked on our linktree👇
